Re: [Chrysler300] reciever drier/oli
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] reciever drier/oli



Thats why I use R134A in all my R12 conversions.
Its cheap to buy and works well.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Rinaldi 
  To: rob kern ; Chrysler 300 Club ; Dave Schwandt 
  Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 4:16 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] reciever drier/oli


    Hi Rob and all,

  We have been using Freeze-12 which has no propane. Are you sure that
  MaxiFrig 12a does not have propane in it. Did a search and came up with the
  following:

  __________________________________________

  Yet another brand name for the same old illegal, dangerous
  hydrocarbon (isopropane/isobutane) blend.

  Does it work? Yeah, it works.

  Is it safe? The sellers say yes, but can't seem to provide enough
  supporting data, despite 15 years of trying, to pass the refrigerant
  safety tests ALL refrigerants are required to pass before they're legally
  approved. The sellers claim it's due to politics and Big Refrigerant Inc's
  desire to own the market. You decide.

  Is it smart to use? No. Virtually no A/C service shop will *touch* a
  system that has had a hydrocarbon refrigerant installed. Working on it
  would contaminate their equipment and their stocks of reclaimed and
  recycled refrigerant. Those few shops willing to work on such tainted
  systems charge a great deal of money to get rid of the illegal
  refrigerant, flush the system and install legal refrigerant.

  __________________________________________

  Ask at www.aircondition.com, but since no information is given about
  what the product is, I have great doubts. It may be like OZ-12, which
  was nothing but a blend of propane and butane, something you definitely
  don't want in a car.

  __________________________________________

  The Maxi-Frig designation MX-12a is a dead giveaway. HC-12a, ES-12a
  "EnviroSafe", etc. -- they're all the same illegal hydrocarbon blend.

  __________________________________________

  The "large tank with gasoline that resides behind you" is subjected to
  crashworthiness testing when the car was manufactured. Its in a
  protected location, with various protections to prevent it from
  spilling, rupturing, or bursting into flame. The AC condensor that is
  the FIRST thing to break in a head-on collision is NOT crashworthiness
  tested when filled with butane/propane blend. The blower motor inside
  the car with the evaporator coil is not spark-arrested for use in an
  environment where butane/propane might leak out.

  Do I think cars with propane/butane refrignerant are rolling time-bombs?
  Not really. But its foolish to pretend that they don't have a higher
  risk of fire or explosion. The question I'd ask myself, is "why take ANY
  risk when there are so many safe, non-flammable alternatives?"

  __________________________________________

  The US for one. ANY flammable blend is illegal.

  The EPA has made it illegal to use flammable refrigerants in motor
  vehicle air conditioning systems. Each potential new refrigerant must be
  tested according to the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM)
  E-681 testing method to determine flammability. In addition to testing
  the refrigerant itself, if a blend contains a flammable component, the
  EPA requires leak testing to ensure that the composition does not change
  during a leak and become flammable.

  http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrigerants/hc-12a.html

  OZ-12 - unacceptable - 3/18/94 OZ Technology Flammable blend of
  hydrocarbons; insufficient data to demonstrate safety.
  R-176 - unacceptable - 3/18/94 Arctic Chill Contains CFC-12, which is
  inappropriate in a CFC-12 substitute.
  HC-12a - unacceptable - 6/13/95 OZ Technology Flammable blend of
  hydrocarbons; insufficient data to demonstrate safety.
  R-405A - unacceptable - 6/13/95 Greencool Contains a perfluorocarbon,
  which has extremely high global warming potential and lifetime.

  If you mouse around on the websites selling this stuff, you'll find them
  talking about "legal 2nd-generation drop-in" refrigerant. This is a bit of
  doublespeak. Here's how it works: It's illegal to replace R12 with
  hydrocarbon refrigerants, but it's not illegal to replace R134a with
  hydrocarbon refrigerants. A law against the latter was never written,
  'cause there's no reason why anybody would ever replace R134a with
  hydrocarbons. Unfortunately, that legal omission is being treated as a
  loophole by those selling hydrocarbon refrigerants. The idea, they say, is
  to convert your system over to R134a (which is legal), then replace the
  R134a with hydrocarbons. Nudge nudge, not illegal, wink wink, elbow in the
  ribs, and if you happen, wink wink, to forget the "change to R134a" step,
  wink wink, why, that would be awful. Wink wink. Just terrible. Wink wink.

  __________________________________________

  From: rob kern <robkern@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Reply-To: rob kern <robkern@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:15:38 -0500
  To: Chrysler 300 Club <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Schwandt
  <finsruskw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] reciever drier/oli

  Dave,
  I have been running R-12 in my factory C A/C system. I recently switched
  to Maxi-Fridge 12a. This is up to 30% more efficient and much cooler than
  R-12 with no environmental hazards. My A/C is cold (front and rear). 12
  cans ran about $78 vs $45/can for R-12 with the requirement of having an A/C
  license to purchase. No conversion equipment required. I obtained it online
  and it was delivered to my front door in 2 days! 300'ly, ROB KERN
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Dave Schwandt
  To: list server 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:08 PM
  Subject: [Chrysler300] reciever drier/oli

  had a fellow tell me I should put a little a/c system oil in my new reciever
  drier before installing it.

  I'm hanging a new rebuilt A/C compressor on the F and EPR valve also. Gonna
  use R-12

  System has been down for 5 years or so and still had a charge in it. The old
  compressor had locked up and burnt the clutch and bearing up.

  Any comments??

  Dave Schwandt

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  > 

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.