Re: [Chrysler300] Value of correct date block

[therichardsonfamily@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I think that there is no difference in the design, engineering, or casting of the blocks that are stamped "HP".  I would guess Doug is probably right on.  440source.com has a lot of info on the casting / block stamping subject, if anyone is interested.

Dan Richardson

300L Family Heirloom

---

From: 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: "Michael Moore" <mmoore8425@xxxxxxx>
Cc: therichardsonfamily@xxxxxxxxxxx, "300 Club" <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:58:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Value of correct date block

Hi Mike,

As far as I know, the HP was stamped on the block during the assembly of the complete engine.

On our 300H's this meant solid lifters, larger valves, a more aggressive cam, etc.

 

Doug Warrener

300H

---

From: "Michael Moore" <mmoore8425@xxxxxxx>
To: therichardsonfamily@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "300 Club" <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 7:49:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Value of correct date block

 

Curious minds want to know:

What exactly is the dofference in the blocks which are HP and those whci are not? Is it simply inspection (as I understand Imperials once were)?

Mike Moore

300H

On Jan 11, 2014, at 7:45 AM, therichardsonfamily@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

 

oooops, I meant "V41" block............

---

From: therichardsonfamily@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: "300 Club" <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:43:16 AM
Subject: Fwd: [Chrysler300] Value of correct date block

 

Group:

 

So, is it confirmed that all 1960 F's were not born with an engine stamp denoting "HP"?  That certainly would make Shannon's search for a "date correct" block much easier - any 413 will do (dated appropriately).  If that is the case, I agree that the added value is definitely worth the effort to find it.

 

And I keep my interest in the "A41" block out there.....

 

Dan Richardson

300L Family Heirloom

(w/ a '67 Imperial's 440 in it - funny thing is, I think my original 413 HP is running around Chicagoland in a white '67 Charger!  Just can't find it!)

---

From: therichardsonfamily@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: LabLoverDC@xxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 3:05:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Value of correct date block

Shannon:

 

I have asked this same question - I have an L with a '67 440 in it.  With my car, I am choosing not to stress out about it too much.  A) - I don't have unlimited resources, and B) - an L is definitely the least prized of the Letter cars.  Besides that, I'm not too sure how many "HP" blocks you can find out there.

 

Having said that, an F is much more valuable in general, even more so with the original motor but, with a "date correct" block (as long as it's disclosed) I can't imagine you detract from a "numbers matching" value too much.  Just an observation and opinion.  If you have the time, and patience, you may be able to uncover the right block.

 

If you are on a schedule that doesn't allow a year or two to look, perhaps you take a stab at it briefly, and then just move forward.  Who knows, maybe a "V41" is the right date code for my early build '65 L and you have me as a customer for yours?  Perhaps it would be in my best interest to help you look?

 

Good luck in whatever you choose, and keep my name in case you do want to sell the "V41" block.

 

Dan Richardson

300L Family Heirloom

---

From: LabLoverDC@xxxxxxx
To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 2:25:05 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Value of correct date block

 

Hello All--Thanks to the excellent information offered here, I've determined the block in our 300 F appears to be from 1964 (V41 HP).  As nearly as we can tell, at some point prior to our owning the car, a short block was put in.  It appears that everything else (ram induction, carbs, heads, etc.) are proper and presumably original to the car.

 

The engine is out of the car, and we are undertaking a complete re-build of it.  My question is, does anyone have an opinion as to whether we should stick with the 1964 block we have, or try to find a 1960 P41 block, which of course would still not be original to the car but would be mostly correct from a date standpoint?  Does that add significant value (enough to make it worth it to go through the expense and trouble of finding a '60 block)?

 

For a point of reference, we are doing a complete, sub-frame off restoration.  While we're not necessarily trying for a concours job, especially with detailed correctness in things like wires, labels, batteries, etc., it will be a very high quality restoration, perhaps one step down from concours (at least, that's what we hope to end up with).  The car itself is a black/tan convertible with factory air, and all of the options appear to be correct according to the build sheet if that helps.

 

I would welcome anyone's opinion on this subject.

 

Shannon

__._,_.___

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join and select the "Leave Group" button

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___