RE: Rear end numbers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Rear end numbers



[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign up today for a No Annual Fee Discover® Platinum Card and get?
0% Intro APR on Purchases & Balance Transfers for 8 Months, Up to 
2% Cashback Bonus® reward on your purchases & 100% fraud 
protection.
caadfzUbOyW3Na/DiscoverCard
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken,
I couldn't find any numbers that would denote the axle ratio on the 
8-3/4" that I took out of my '64, and I thought that I looked it over 
pretty well...Brian

Westerlund, Ken wrote:
> 
> How come we can have 100 responses about welding the roof from a 53
> Hudson onto a 64 Max Wedge car, but nothing about the location of the
> rear end numbers on an 8-3/4 rear?  :-)
> 
> What if I say I want to put the rear (if I can check the numbers into a
> 62 Chrysler 300 with a M1 turret mounted over the passenger compartment?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Westerlund, Ken 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:47 AM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Rear end numbers
> 
> If I recall correctly, older 8-3/4 rear ends have the ratio stamped on
> them instead of using a tag.
> Where is the number stamped?  Also, doesn't the number have a prefix for
> a suregrip?
> Thanks,
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Schlump [mailto:jsbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 6:46 PM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Useful info about rearend messure.
> 
> Earl,
> I question the accuracy of a couple of dimensions on the chart. The "C" 
> dimension for all 8 3/4 "B" bodies is listed at 12.35".  That might be 
> correct for one of the 2 diff cases used, but not for both.  The 742 was
> 
> longer than the 489 I put in to replace it.
> 
> The chart lists '62 - '70 "B" bodies with 55" flange to flange.  I 
> needed more clearance between the tire and the fender, so I was told to 
> install a '65 - '70 rear end without the tapered axles, because they are
> 
> 1" narrower.  I had both rearends sitting side by side on jack stands 
> with the brake drums installed, and the '70 measured 1" narrower, 
> outside of drum to outside of drum, just as I had been told.   I've 
> already sold the '64 rearend, or I'd go out and measure them again to 
> get the exact dimensions...Brian
> 



'64 Belvedere
Woodstock, IL.

[AD removed for archives]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
How would you like a Complimentary Kmart $500 GiftCard by 
participating in our special promotion? 
caadi1cbOyW3Nf/RewardsVenue
-------------------------------------------------------------------

----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 



bOyW3N.








Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.