RE: OEM 1964 383's

[Willard Edison <waedison1@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob, do you think it was a difference in heads, exhaust, crank throw, or
what that made the difference in HP? Thanks/Butch, Ferndale, WA 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob H. [mailto:bhokanson@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 1:02 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: OEM 1964 383's


Yep. This takes me back almost 44 yrs but I can remember how great I felt
about my mother buying a 63 Dodge 440 model 2dr HT with a "Power Pack" 383.
Then my disappointment when I found it was a 2 bbl with single exhaust. I
believe it was rated at 305 HP. The "High Performance" 
383 had a 4 bbl, dual exhaust and was rated at 330 HP.
The 2 bbl was torquey but lacked the top end breathing ability of the 4 bbl
motor.

Bob H

mcwheels@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Are you guys
> sure there was a 383 2-bbl. in the early 60's?


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

. 



http://www/?p=