RE: Racer brown cam and exhausting situation

[george smith <bt6t4@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the validation Earl! I knew I read
something about it. I might even have the magazine
stashed somewhere. I've emiled 2 of the mags so
far,but will look today for the issue. So much for my
preception of time..lol
--- "Earl H. " <earlh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> George,
> 
> I remember reading this within the last year. I am
> not sure 
> it was a test, but a referance in a test article
> about the HP difference.
> 
> Earl 
> 
> 
> I hadn't brought this up before,my memory being what
> is now. Within the last
> 4-5 yrs. one of the Mopar mags,I believe,did a
> comparison test between
> headers and MW manifolds. I wish I could recall the
> results.I'm going to
> make it my mission to find out which one,if
> possible.
> --- Joeydahook9@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Brian - that's a lot of cash, but if it's what you
> > want, go for it.   I'm 
> > taking so long building my motor/drivetrain
> because I have to save up 
> > to get  the parts, as most of us do.  I want my
> motor to look bone 
> > stock, but I  have the MW manifolds and an old 383
> factory 2x4 inline 
> > on it.  No chrome,  factory turquoise paint.  I'm
> still hoping to find 
> > a set of those football  shaped air cleaners for a
> reasonable price 
> > someday.  The motor is a "Old  Reliable"  type
> > 451 stroker.  Headers as well as a modern intake
> would  surely make 
> > more power, but I'm hoping those Mopar engineers
> from the 60's had a  
> > reason for those MW manifolds.  Then again, with
> today's technology, 
> > small  blocks make 60's big block power.  They
> just cover the motors 
> > up with plastic shielding now.
> > Today's WOW factor is how many TV screens are in 
> > the car.   Joe
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- 
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> transactions and 
> > negotiations as well as other personal messages
> only to the intended 
> > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This practice will 
> > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of
> mail and fine tune 
> > the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > 
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> George
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


George



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http:///u/?.. 
Or send an email to: 1962to1965mopars-unsubscribe@


http:///?p=