RE: Courtesy lights and bulb question

[Herb <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jake: 
 
Doing some research go with the #90 bulb! It is smaller in diameter and
shorter. The #1004 is rated at 12v so it is brighter, hotter and closer to
lens, bad for lens. The #90 is rated at 13.5v maybe not as bright but will
burn cooler and is further away from lens better for lens! As I get time I
am researching using a LED that will burn a lot cooler. I have found a LED
replacement for a #90 that will work but it is $14.95 each. Their has to be
something less expensive. Stay tuned for further information!!  
          
Herb 
 
1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361 
1970 Challenger RT 440 
1999 Durango SLT 5.9 
2006 300-C Heritage 5.7 
2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1 
St. Louis, MO. 


-------Original Message------- 
 
From: Doug Jacobsma 
Date: 08/12/08 20:54:14 
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: RE: Courtesy lights and bulb question 
 
 
1004 sounds right. Was thinking something a bit smaller might help preserve
the lenses this time. That or not leaving them on like an idiot. Maybe
Stearns as suggested by Gary H. Might have a slightly smaller bulb. 
 
Jake 
'63 Sport Fury 'vert


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER