Re: HOLY $#@&
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HOLY $#@&



I'm rare and irreplaceable to my wife, kids and grandkids, and I bet they would sell me for a lot less than what he is asking for that k frame.
The old saying is....A part is worth what someone will pay for it and maybe someone out there is willing to pay that much but I doubt it.

--- On Mon, 4/19/10, Sledcity@xxxxxxx <Sledcity@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Sledcity@xxxxxxx <Sledcity@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:36 PM
> 
> 
> It's the real deal, I have seen it . It's rare
>  
>  
> In a message dated 4/19/2010 2:30:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight
> Time,  
> bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx
> writes:
> 
> I worked  with steel products for 30 years and it
> doesn't look like 
> aluminum. It looks  like stainless but I question if
> it is 17 pounds.
> Stainless is lighter, but  not that much lighter.
> Later
> Bill
> 
> 
> --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Dave64  <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Dave64  <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: HOLY $#@&
> > To:  1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 2:24  PM
> > That weight sounds more like
> > aluminum.
> > 
> > ---  On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >  
> > > From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject:  Re: HOLY $#@&
> > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >  Date: Monday, April 19, 2010, 1:17 PM
> > > 
> > > and would  stainless steel be THAT much
> lighter so that
> > it
> > > weighs  only
> > > 17 pounds? That doesn't really make sense to me.
> >  > 
> > > -- 
> > > Bill M
> > > 65 Coronet 500 'vert  http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > > 73 Dart Sport,  00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota
> SLT
> > > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92  Accord, 06 Mazda
> 3
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 19,  2010 at 2:15 PM, William
> Harrison
> > <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >  wrote:
> > > > Man on Man is he ever proud of this 
> piece..With
> > no
> > > documentation is it worth what he is  asking
> and with
> > > documentation is it worth what he is 
> asking.
> > > > Even if I had a spare 15 grand, I
> wouldn't  buy
> > it, I
> > > would have one made.
> > > >
> >  > > Bill Harrison
> > > > 65 Coronet 2 dr post
> > >  >
> > > > --- On Mon, 4/19/10, Bill  <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >  > >> From: Bill <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>  Subject: HOLY $#@&
> > > >> To:
> > > >> Date:  Monday, April 19, 2010,
> 11:57 AM
> > > >>
> > > >>  
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1965-426-Race-Hemi-Factory-Altered-Wheel-Base-K-Frame_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4395825ecdQQitemZ290271157965QQp
> tZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
> >  > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----
> > >  Please address private mail -- mail of
> interest to
> > only one
> >  > person -- directly to that person. 
> I.e., send
> > >  parts/car transactions and negotiations as
> well as
> > other
> > >  personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not
> > to the
> >  > Clubhouse public address. This practice
> will protect
> > your
> >  > privacy, reduce the total volume of mail
> and fine tune
> >  the
> > > content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > >  
> > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > >  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> > >  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
> person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
> 
>



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.