Re: What oil? Rotella T?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What oil? Rotella T?




Can we please not go around the "oil filter quality" block again? The list has done it several times over the years...always turns into an arguement, and, finally, to a political bashing thread.. People will use whatever brand they want, or have used for years with no problems.

Rant off.


Darwin/BC/Canada
--'65 Cdn.Val.Custom 100 'vert
--'67 Dart GT 'vert...
Check'em out...  http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e285/65val




----- Original Message ----- From: "William Harrison" <bbjt3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: What oil? Rotella T?


The ones I cut apart were from Autozone.
BTW Fram filters are not made in the USA anymore.
When you can't find American made products nor find a job; thank NAFTA.
Later
Bill

--- On Sat, 5/1/10, MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: MO ( Steve Mick) <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What oil? Rotella T?
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Saturday, May 1, 2010, 1:41 AM

Fram really shot themselves in the foot when they started
making a cheap filter for discount stores. . The competitors
jumped right on them by cutting those filters into and
comparing the famous frams to their better made product. I
would not now buy a fram even if they proved that their top
of the line was best.....................................MO

{Steve Mick}
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html

----- Original Message ----- From: "Herb" <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: What oil? Rotella T?




In the old days I would only use Fram filters. Saw an
article a while back
that basically confirmed your findings. No more
Fram's for me! Just like
Pennzoil, an inferior product with good marketing!!

             
Herb

1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361
1959 Coronet 326 Poly
1961 Belvedere Custom Suburban 318 Poly
1962 Dodge Dart 225 Slant Six
1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1L
1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361
1999 Durango SLT 5.9L
2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1L
St. Louis, MO.

http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html




-------Original Message-------

From: William Harrison
Date: 4/30/2010 11:45:23 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What oil? Rotella T?

If you cut a fram filter in half and compare it to "any"
other filter, you
will find that "any" other filter is better.
A few years ago I cut a fram, bosch, mobile 1, ac delco,
and stp in half.
It was laughable to see the lack of filtering material in
the fram.
The mobile 1 was the best with the bosch coming in second
and the stp filter
was better than the ac delco.
It is an easy way to find out if you are getting a good
filter or not.
Synthetic oil is so much better for your engine.
Makes it run cooler, much better lubricating and lasts
longer.
Later
Bill Harrison
65 Coronet 2 dr post.

--- On Fri, 4/30/10, Jim Altemose <jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> From: Jim Altemose <jaltemoose@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: What oil? Rotella T?
> To: "1962to1965mopars" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, April 30, 2010, 12:18 PM
>
> Any new opinions on the best oil to use in our old
cars?
>
> I recall there was some discussion a while back
regarding
> Rotella and
> whether or not the formula changed. Is Rotella
T
> Triple Protection
> still a good choice? Is there less ZDDP than
there
> used to be and
> should some be added? FRAM filters?
>
> How about synthetic? I think I recall Don
Dulmage was
> not a fan and
> thought it wasn't 'springy'.
>
> As always, thanks.
>
> - Jim
> Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
> '63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
> '63 Polara 500 (383)
> '65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
> '71 Bronco
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
only one
> person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as
other
> personal messages only to the intended recipient, not
to the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
your
> privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune
the
> content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one
person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other
personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your
privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.







----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.