Re: I have an idea for a Slant Six
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I have an idea for a Slant Six



Roderek,

Fun to think about.  What would be the advantage of the 3 4-barrel
carbs as opposed to a single high enough cfm carb?  2 or 3 of the
turbos could be run in parallel to the single carb and I would think
this would greatly simplify building the intake and tuning and linkage
and such.  There's carbs big enough to feed top fuel dragsters, they
can certainly feed a slant six.

Looking forward to hearing from the guys smarter than I am.

- Jim
Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
'63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
'63 Polara 500 (383)
'65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
'71 Bronco

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Bob Asay <polyhead64@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Don Dulmage mopar guru extrodainare put a slant in a dragster. Bob A
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:16:31 -0500
>  Jacob Fox <imfast101@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I thought i was youngest on here at 23 lol. Electronic controller is super
>> easy, no big calculations there. Op Engineer myself. Just get a servo and
>> some wire, done. I've never seen a setup like youre talking. I look forward
>> to hearing what is said, as my friend has a /6 in a dart he's thinking about
>> beefin up.
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Roderek Soest <awesomemau5heads@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am 17, so i have the speed bug. My 1965 plymouth barracuda has a
>>> slant 6 and i have an idea to make it a super powerful classic. Now,
>>> we all know stock, taht the slant 6's are tough. But, is it possible
>>> to beef it and run this configuration? My idea is to beef up the
>>> engine as much as I can to handle the speed and power and run it like
>>> this. It will have a standard single barrel, and 3- 4barrel carbs on
>>> the same intake that can feed all the pistons, and have 3 T4 turbos.
>>> each turbo is connected to a single 4 barrel and the middle turbo will
>>> be also connected to the single barrel (for fuel efficiency while not
>>> racing). Each waste gate will connected to an electronic controller (i
>>> will build  the electronics since i am studying to be an engineer) and
>>> It will have an electronic fuel pump for the 4 barrel's. while the
>>> single is connected to the mechanical fuel pump. While the engine is
>>> normal driving mode, the middle turbo will feed the single with a
>>> partially opened waste gate to control boost, and will close the other
>>> carbs. when I engage it into different level race modes( based upon
>>> expected power needed) it will allow the use of the other carbs and
>>> turbos based on the selected program. And possibly a NO2 as well for a
>>> real punch. I just want to know if I can make the engine handle the
>>> power, and not bog it out, or blow it up. i also would retro fir the
>>> driveline and chasis to handle the power. Another option would be to
>>> not use carbs, but fuel injection. So, what are your thoughts?
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
>>> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
>>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
>>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
>>> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
>>> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>>>
>>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
>> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
>> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
>> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>>
>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.