Re: Pertronix

[MO <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Cory, No offence inended, but I think you should be skeptical about
what your soutces are tellong you. . Every product has a few that
aren't right in some way==but most problems with Pertronics is because
of installation error.  I have had mine for 6 years and 20,000 miles
with no problem.  Howeverf I do wish the instructions at the time
would make it a little more clear about what coil should be used and
whether or not the ballast resister is needed . I did not use a
ballast resister .............MO

On Dec 16, 8:41 pm, Cory Rempel <cory_...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I only heard about Pertronix ignition when I joined this group about 5 yrs ago.  And from what you guys have been saying about the product, it sounds like a real shitty set up.  To say I've heard more bad than good is an understatement.  Seems like for every 2 positive stories about this pruduct there's 7 or 8 negative ones.  A buddy of mine was gonna buy one of their set ups until I told him some of the horror stories that I read on this very site.  Needless to say he didn't buy it. My question is, if they have such a piss poor track record, how are they still in business?

-- 
-- 
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.