Re: IML: '65 engine choice - economics likely to decide?

["john sadowski" <jsadowski@xxxxxxx>]

Not to start another 413-440 debate, but if  I had a choice, I'd replace a 
440 with a 413 any day. They
just seem to run better & not as prone to overheating & hard starting when 
hot.  Just my .02
John
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Klebert L. Hall" <swampyankee@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: IML: '65 engine choice - economics likely to decide?


> > Subject: Re: IML: Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:40:52 -0500
> > From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
> >
> > I wasn't going to say anything, but I agree with Kenyon on this.
> > A 1965 Imperial was a great car and the engine it came with worked
> > just fine. I can see no real advantage to installing the 440 over the 
> > 413.
>
>
>    It's true, the difference is only 10hp and 10 lb-ft.
>    Now, if you were going to go more custom with the car and wanted to 
> supe up the engine, there are a lot of 440 hi-performance parts out there, 
> and it's probably be easier and cheaper to do that with a 440 instead of a 
> 413.
>       -Kle.
>       '69 Crown 4DHT
>
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to 
> mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with 
> everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm