Re: IML: 440 set up for towing

[<mopar413@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

---- "Michael O. Mann" <mann340s@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> I saw early in this thread a note that the 413 was used in RV's through 77.
> I knew it remained for some time in heavy duty use, but didn't know they
> used the 413 that long.  I have a 78 RV, and it does indeed have a 440.  I'd
> guess a 78 or later RV would be a great 440 donor.
> 
> In these applications, the water pump/heads/something was different for
> extra cooling.
> Some of the older motor homes ran 440s also . I have one from a 72 with the steel crank.
> It would be helpful in deciding if these motors are reasonable/economical
> replacements if some of you who know could describe these differences,
> whether they affect performance negatively or positively in a (slightly)
> lighter Imperial, and if the differences can be eliminated economically
> during a rebuild.
> 
> Mine, as is, along with the frame (shortened), suspension, etc., is going
> under my D100 cab and bed to make the "Imperial Hauler."  Maybe Darth Vader
> Black if I can get the body straight enough.
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm