[FWDLK] Fw: [FWDLK] Local Parish Ordinances Against Antique Cars On Ones
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FWDLK] Fw: [FWDLK] Local Parish Ordinances Against Antique Cars On Ones Property



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill K." <pontiac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Scavengers58@xxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Local Parish Ordinances Against Antique Cars On Ones
Property


>
> Where I used to live we had one a-hole who'd complain about my cars - not
> any of the other two dozen unliscenced cars in the neighborhood, including
a
> couple that haven't moved an inch in over 20 years - just mine.
>
> I'd beat him by putting plates on the cars and either letting the
> registration run out before the insurance (so you don't have to turn in
the
> plates) or renewing it as needed and just sending the town a photocopy of
> the current registration cards.  Because they were registered and insured,
> they fit the letter of the law if not the spirit.  Which fixed this
turkey,
> because I never moved the cars an inch.  I thought about moving them right
> up against the ugly as sin chain link fence he put up so he could see them
> every time he looked into his backyard, but decided not to bother.
>
> If the vehicles need only be 'operable' your parts cars are in trouble,
but
> it should be easily demonstratable for those which run and drive.
>
> I have one like that that very obviously has no engine in it and another
> which I have since transferred the registration to another car, but left
one
> plate on it for the codes people to see.  Has been like that since
October;
> codes officer inspected in June over another matter, and ok'ed the
property
> after I cleaned up some crap that had been accumulating.
>
> You should be able to put an inexpensive antique policy on the cars, like
a
> friend of mine does.  Put the minimum coverage on them if you're not
driving
> them, maybe can even get a storage only policy that will let you keep
plates
> on the cars.
>
>
> I'd check into my zoning to see if I could put up one of those steel
> buildings I hear advertised on the radio so much, or bring in 2 or 3 40'
> shipping containers (which are ugly as sin for your neighbors to enjoy
> looking at!) and then space them one container width apart, put a top
> between the two and cap one end, and you get a third stall space.
>
> If they won't give you time, around here a storage unit big enough for two
> cars is under $100 a month.  which it may help your case to remove some of
> the vehicles to another location.  Usually they are good about giving
people
> time to comply with their wishes, but you never know when you'll get some
> busybody SOB with his own adgenda in there either.  The irony usually is
> these laws make you put parts cars and real pieces of crap in a garage and
> good stuff has to stay outside, to conform to the law.
>
>
> You live somewhere, you own your land, you pay the taxes, and here is the
> government telling you what you can and can't do with it.. reminds me of
> communism.  So much for freedom - to me zoning laws should be
> unconstitutional.   For every adult bookstore they keep away from an
> elementary school there's 2 or 3 guys being screwed out of a hobby or a
> source of income.   One mans junk is another man's treasure, and I happen
to
> like looking out my window at old cars.  Some people call it 'yard art' so
> how you can have a law based on an opinion of what is or is not an eyesore
> is beyond me.  I don't want to see my neighbor's ugly-ass chain link
fence,
> but that's legal.  (actually I don't want to see that neighbor either, but
> there's no zoning law against his being a pain in the rear end).  The
other
> thing I hate is a zoning officer can legally harass you - he can keep
coming
> back and makiing you change things and there is not much you can do to
stop
> him.
>
>
> Hopefully you can find out who complained and scan his property and report
> any violations he's commiting while you're at it; heck, get the codes book
> and report anonymously anything that looks like it might be a violation so
> he can deal with inspections left and right.   Bastards like that need to
> learn to mind their own business; 50 or 100 years ago you could have given
> them what for and gotten away with it, but not anymore.
>
>
> Bill K.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Sazdoff" <Scavengers58@xxxxxx>
> To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 12:23 AM
> Subject: [FWDLK] Local Parish Ordinances Against Antique Cars On Ones
> Property
>
>
> > Hi Everyone....I'm sure quite a few of you have been through what I am
> going
> > through right now.   It seems that a disgruntled neighbor of mine has
> reported
> > me to the local code enforcement bureau in my township (parish).  I
> received
> > a rather terse letter from this body stating that I must remove, make
> > operable, or store in an enclosed building the vehicles on my property.
> Now, these
> > cars can barely be seen from the street. There is a very large tree
which
> > conceals the cars in my side yard.....and the others are way in the rear
> of my
> > property under a car port and in the rear drive.  One of these is my
Prize
> 57
> > Plymouth Conv.  the others are 2 '68 Olds 98 Conv., 1 '70 Olds Cutlas
> Conv., a 59
> > Cadillac parts car, a 58 Plymouth parts car.  Under the car port:  '39
> Buick
> > Century, '58 Plymouth Belvedere 2 door hardtop....Loaded, and a '58
Chevy
> Apache
> >  Pickup Truck. These cars are all restorable, but not currently running.
> > This agency gives me 10 days to comply, which the letter states is
> mandatory.
> > This is really sick!  I am going down to this office Monday to discuss a
> more
> > realistic time frame, and any other options I might have.  My question
to
> any of
> > you out there....particularly any Lawyers is this:  If I erect a fence
> > completely enclosing the yard area where the cars are....concealing
> them.....will
> > this be sufficient?  And,  Will a "Cover It" Temporary Enclosure meet
the
> > requirement to store in an enclosed building??  This is really making me
> very sick.
> > This is part of my car collection which took years to acquire and now a
> > township ordinance is threatening to destroy the entire hobby for me.
> Seems so
> > Un-American.  My place is not a Blighted Property and like I said, you
can
> hardly
> > tell that there are cars back there.  Any advice would really be
> appreciated.
> >  Please don't ask to buy any of the forwardlook cars as I will go down
> with
> > the ship before I part with these.  Thanks to All of You in advance.
> George.
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.710 / Virus Database: 466 - Release Date: 6/23/2004
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.710 / Virus Database: 466 - Release Date: 6/23/2004



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright 2018 The Forward Look Network.  All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.