|
Shoot, Vancouver is not that far from Seattle, and
I know we have several Seattle area members who would've gladly let them paint
their car red and white for the film (if they'd paint it back, probably).
Of course, if they'd REALLY been looking hard, they might've found Rogers '59
already red and white convertible, and if I know Roger, he'd have found it
really cool to have his car on film. . . . .heck I'd almost (ALMOST) let them
paint my '57 Fury red and white for a movie. . .of course, they would DEFINITELY
have to paint it back again!!
Mark mjh
Sutherlin, OR
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 6:49
AM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Riding the
Bullet
the question
and answer section explains why they could not find a 58 but did find a 60.
and they did apologize.
I have been
seeing the trailers tonight for Steven King's "Riding the Bullet", featuring
a Fury. The site, http://www.usanetwork.com/movies/ridingthebullet/,
talks about "Christine", and the car being a '58 Fury, but show the car to
be a 1960, while the "B" car they use for the crash scene shows it to be a
1959 Plymouth. Are they uncaring, unknowing, or do they think that we
cannot distinguish the fact that they are talking and using three different
years of Plymouths?
I mean, I certainly am glad they feature
ForwardLook cars, but get a grip here.
Larry (in cold, snowy Akron,
Ohio)
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network