Re: [FWDLK] Price Insanity
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] Price Insanity



Who says?  Facts and figures please.  Are you saying that brand name loyalty isn't a factor in selling cars?
 
If "the past" doesn't sell cars, why the new "Hemi," "Ram," "Charger," "Challenger," "300," etc.?
 
--Roger van Hoy, Washougal, WA, '55 DeSoto, '58 DeSoto, '56 Plymouth, '66 Plymouth, '41 Dodge
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Price Insanity

In a message dated 4/19/2007 10:38:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, vanhilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Another take on the situation-- I've got some Brand F products, and the F
Corp encourages restoration of their cars by licensing repro parts.  Shoot,
I could put my F brand together easily and reasonably with all new parts.
The Got Mine Corp. is equally favorable.  WHY IS D-C SO RETICENT TO ALLOW
NORS PARTS FOR OUR CARS?  They're finally granting some licenses for
'60's-'70's muscle cars.  Are they ashamed of our Forward Look stuff?
  Why?  DC does NOT want to live in the past!  The Past does NOT sell NEW vehicles.  Period!
DC is in BUSINESS to sell NEW vehicles. 


*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.