Re: [Chrysler300] Disc Brake Upgrade Options
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] Disc Brake Upgrade Options





You are right John & Don. 4310 lbs. I was only about one ton off. 

Point being AAJ  and SS Brake front discs are anemic. 

Sorry my mistake took away from the conversation that I intended. 

Tony



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 2:08 PM, dverity@xxxxxxxxxxx <dverity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That is still not even close. John listed the proper shipping weights. Loaded with gas and fluids, your car wouldn’t be more than 4,500, unless you weighed it with 4 500 pound guys in the car.
Don
 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Disc Brake Upgrade Options
 
 

Sorry  typo 6500? It is a convertible 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, 11:30 AM, John Lazenby <french_fryguy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Tony,

Possibly I'm reading your post incorrectly but how did you arrive at the "6800 pound car" figure?  I'm looking in the Standard Catalog of Chrysler 1924-1990 by John Lee.  On page 169 under the 1960 300F series weights stated are:
 
Weight at 4270 2dr HT Cpe-4P
 
Weight at 4310 2dr Conv Cpe-4P
 
I had the AAJ kit on the front of our 300F coupe which I sold a few years ago and also have the same kit on our 300C coupe which we still own.  Better breaking than the original drum set up but still leave much to be desired compared to vehicles of today.
 
John Lazenby
 



From: "Tony Rinaldi awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Chrysler 300 Club <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 8:04 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Disc Brake Upgrade Options
 
 
Hi To All,
 
Want to share my experience (Confessions) with my 300-F conv't front and back brake conversions (SS Brakes) that was done probably 15 years ago.
 
The car stops much better than the original drums but it really is inadequate for a 6800 pound car.
 
The front brakes are 1968 Mustang and the rear is 1988 Ford Turbo Thunderbird.
 
The built in parking brake assembly in the rear brakes never worked right in 1988 and the same is true now with multiple tries at new calipers over the years.
 
The mounting bracket for the rear brakes just failed and is inadequate. The left rear caliper just loosened.
 
Had it fixed and had new pads put in the LR with keeping the damaged rotor for now.
 
I must redo both the front and rear.
 
I have decided on the Magnum Force/Wilwood Brake systems.
 
The table below compare 3 systems FYI.
AAJ BrakesSS BrakesMagnum Force/Wilwood
FrontName/NumberFront Brake KitA154-4Z-140-14227
Caliper1 Piston4 Piston4 Piston
Rotor11"11 1/4" X .08"11 3/4" X 1 1/4"
Rotor Slotted & Drilled?NoYesYes
RearName/NumberRear Brake KitA155-2140-10767-D
Caliper1 Piston1 Piston4 Piston
Rotor11"10.5" X .93"12.9" X 0.81"
Parking BrakeNoYesYes
Rotor Slotted & Drilled?NoYesYes

The front kit is only distributed by Magnum Force (a Wilwood dealer) and they designed the bracket.
 
The rear kit that we chose will need some modifications since it is for a 8 3/4” rear from 1963 on. My 1960 rear flanges have a different bolt pattern.
 
The kits have been ordered and I will let you know how the projects works out over the next month to so.
 
Tony




__._,_.___

Posted by: Tony Rinaldi <awrdoc@xxxxxxxxx>


To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang




Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Groups
PrivacyUnsubscribeTerms of Use

__,_._,___


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap