Re: [Chrysler300] 1962 Driveshaft Length(s)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chrysler300] 1962 Driveshaft Length(s)





The 62 Newport driveshaft would work for other 122" wheelbase 62s, but the Newport u-joint is smaller - at least it is on the 63/64s.
John in Florida 



On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:16 PM, Cox Scooter465@xxxxxxx [Chrysler300]
<Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 

New Yorker wagon is long

Wheel base. 300 sport is
A short wheel base car 122 in.
A Newport wagon was short
Wheel base 122 in. So I would
Think you would have to get a
Drive shaft from a a short wheel base car for your sport.
Newport's would probably all
Work.

Bob Haag

On Jun 12, 2020, at 6:25 PM, Matt Allyn allynentertainment@xxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

  

I assume that the driveshafts were all made to fit every model Chrysler in 1962; right?

In other words....
- If I were to take my New Yorker Wagon driveshaft...
- Use it as a pattern to have one made for my 300 Sport OR H....
- It would be good to go; right?

Thanks!
Matt Allyn



__._,_.___

Posted by: John <spiers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang




Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Groups
PrivacyUnsubscribeTerms of Use

__,_._,___


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.