Re: Block markings & trans stuff
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Block markings & trans stuff



The 65's had the same  amount of cables.
Actually they are the same as the pushbutton units, with the exception 
of the output housing and shaft, and the absence of a rooster comb 
indent inside of the trans.

   Jimmy

Paul Lennemann wrote:

>Bill Maurits wrote:
>  
>
>>I had a conversation with an "old" Mopar mechanic last night. He
>>worked for a local Chrysler dealer for ~40 years and has recently
>>retired to make money building and playing w/ and building race cars
>>and motors...name is Garry Neese (sp?) if anyone knows him.
>>
>>Anyway, we got on the topic of block markings and he thought that
>>sometime in the mid 60's was when they STARTED stamping ID's into
>>blocks and before ~64 (he was not sure of the year) there was no year
>>on the block or ID stamped...only a casting number. Is this true? If
>>so, what was the cut off year?
>>
>>Next onto trannys - If I'm correct, 64 & older trannys had 2 cables,
>>65's were 1 cable, 1 linkage, and 66 & newer were 2
>>linkages...correct? Also, what year did the input shaft diameter
>>change to the "modern" setup...was that 66 and 65's had the smaller
>>shaft? Or did they change in 67?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Bill M
>>65 Coronet 500 'vert
>>73 Dart Sport
>>    
>>
>
>
>Well, I can respond @ the 64 & older tranny's.  If I understand the 
>question, they actually had three cables, shift, park, & speedo.
>
>
>Paul L.
>'63 Sport Fury
>440/727
>http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/ml-lennemann63.html
>
>
>----
>Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
>'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.