The Forward Look Network
The Forward Look Network
Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Chat | eBay | Calendars | Albums | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

lead additives necessary or not?
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forward Look NON-Technical Discussions -> 1955-1961 Forward Look MoPar General DiscussionMessage format
 
1960DesotoAdventurer
Posted 2010-06-20 10:39 PM (#228835)
Subject: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3588
20001000500252525
Location: Plymouth Spaceport
I am curious as to the effectiveness of lead substitutes and if they are necessary or not.
I seen a few people here mention they don't use them and have never had any problems after years of driving,and have been told they aren't necessary as long as the car isn't driven hard and has a low compression engine.
So what's the truth? Anybody have any conclusive facts one way or the other?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
snik
Posted 2010-06-20 10:56 PM (#228836 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?


Veteran

Posts: 184
100252525
Location: Canada
as far as I know, the stuff that's sold as lead substitute is not really lead at all... it's just unrefined oil (as in crude oil that's refined a little but not so much)... so I am not sure how effective they are as substitutes
Top of the page Bottom of the page
58Donnie
Posted 2010-06-20 10:57 PM (#228837 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?


Account Suspended

Posts: 2827
200050010010010025
Location: At "The Rock" in upper East Tennessee
All I can say is that my more or less stock poly head runs better with it. Without it I notice a skip in her and hesitation at times she also seems to run a tad hotter. With it none of these are problems. That may not be an all conclusive fact but it is my experience.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MOPAR-TO-YA
Posted 2010-06-21 12:23 AM (#228850 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: RE: lead additives necessary or not?


Expert 5K+

Posts: 5139
500010025
Location: cornpatch county, Southwest IOA
For the past couple of years I have been using "GUNK" brand lead sustitute I have a Holley Street Avenger carb on it.. I also have periodic problems with the way it runs ( stalling, rough running- missing) I checked and re-checked everything and could not find The problem. Finally I put my hand over the choke plate after it had warmed up- to manually choke it and ravved the engine several times to really creat a vacume through the venturis I choked it down ttill it would barely run and then remove my hand frome the carb. It cleared right up. My conclusion: every time I had a problem, I had gone about 20 miles after putting in gas and everytime I would also put in some lead substitute. I do believe it was clogging up my idle circuit in the carb. Since I quit using it, the engine never stalls or miss a lick. I am considering adding a little of Marvel Mystery oil to the gas and see what happens.............................MO
Top of the page Bottom of the page
dukeboy
Posted 2010-06-21 12:46 AM (#228853 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert 5K+

Posts: 6203
50001000100100
Location: Big pimpin'
The reason all this came about was for the exhaust valve seats..It has been said that the exhaust valve seats get pounded on from the lack of lubrication from the lead that WAS in fuel....With that said, I took a set of the famous "915" heads to the local machine shop and he made a very good observation when I asked for hardened seats on the exhaust side....He stated that "D@mn Chaney, any new cast iron head doesn't come with steel hardened seats, so why would you think these heads need 'em? I mean, the new heads run on unleaded fuel right?" I thought about it, and came to the same conclusion...You don't NEED the hardened seats, but to be on the safe side, I'd run some sort of "Additive" to keep your piece of mind....I still run some every now and then....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
57PlymouthNC
Posted 2010-06-21 1:11 AM (#228856 - in reply to #228853)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?


Extreme Veteran

Posts: 331
10010010025
Location: Northern North Carolina
I had a big question about this as well, before having my 1957 Belvedere engine rebuilt. The consensus from more than a dozen old car buffs, gearheads, engine rebuilding shops, professional mechanics etc was pretty much "if you don't plan to drive your car much, or drive it hard, or pull a load, or drive in the mountains, you can probably get by without using lead substitute". That was a lot of "if's" to me....so I've been using lead substitute post-rebuild (I elected not to have the valve seats hardened). I can't recall which brand I use; lead substitute has gotten harder to find, but I buy the brand still readily available [so far] at Auto Zone. I also add it to every fill-up, in the '61 Fairlane.

...........
1956 Pontiac StarChief
1957 Plymouth Belvedere
1961 Ford Fairlane
Top of the page Bottom of the page
B/G 61
Posted 2010-06-21 4:57 AM (#228870 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: RE: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 2612
2000500100
Location: Parts Unknown
The valve seats are not hardened in my car - I run Cam 2 on occasion and the high octane at the pump mix . . .

Last time I bought an additive it was called Real Lead . . . Don't know if they still make it or not . . .





Top of the page Bottom of the page
njlimbaugh
Posted 2010-06-21 10:44 AM (#228885 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?


Extreme Veteran

Posts: 421
100100100100
Location: N. Georgia
As far as those of you still running the old flathead six, the block in those engines is harder than the new 'hardened' valve seats. I rebuilt the engine in an old 37 Dodge about 4 years ago. The machinist told me that when doing the valve seats, most of them can be redone with a cutter, but the old Mopar flatheads require grinding as they will wreck a cutter! But I have no experience with the later V-8 engines.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mopar1
Posted 2010-06-21 11:13 AM (#228889 - in reply to #228885)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3034
2000100025
Location: N.W. Fla.
Hemis: The '55s have hardend valves & seats, post '55 300s & truck hemis did also.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
snik
Posted 2010-06-21 5:37 PM (#228935 - in reply to #228889)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?


Veteran

Posts: 184
100252525
Location: Canada
Mopar1 - 2010-06-21 11:13 AM

Hemis: The '55s have hardend valves & seats, post '55 300s & truck hemis did also.


what about the poly heads in 55 Chryslers?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
d500neil
Posted 2010-06-21 7:22 PM (#228947 - in reply to #228935)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Exner Expert 19,174 posts. Neil passed away 18 Sep 2015. You will be missed, Neil!

Posts: 19146
5000500050002000200010025
Location: bishop, ca
56-57 Dodge engines do not have hardened valve seats in them; the Chryslers do have hardened seats in them.

When my car's heads were O/H'ed I had the stellite valve seats installed, altho there was no recession in the seat areas
when that upgrade work was done.

Now, I don't have to worry about including any particular gas additives, to protect the heads/valves.

Installing those hardened valve seats is a no-brainer, when/if a car's heads are being worked on.




Top of the page Bottom of the page
Shep
Posted 2010-06-21 7:24 PM (#228950 - in reply to #228935)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3399
20001000100100100252525
Location: Chestertown, NY ( near Lake George)
Only the exhaust valves in the Hemis were hardened inserts. Which is ok, the intakes are really not an issue.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
d500neil
Posted 2010-06-21 7:31 PM (#228951 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Exner Expert 19,174 posts. Neil passed away 18 Sep 2015. You will be missed, Neil!

Posts: 19146
5000500050002000200010025
Location: bishop, ca
..And that is because the larger intake valves are naturally cooled by the incoming air-fuel mixture, while the
small exhaust valves have to deal with the heat and pressure of the burned air-fuel mixture.

Good point.


Top of the page Bottom of the page
59CRL
Posted 2010-06-21 7:41 PM (#228955 - in reply to #228950)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 2679
2000500100252525
Shep - 2010-06-21 7:24 PM

Only the exhaust valves in the Hemis were hardened inserts. Which is ok, the intakes are really not an issue.


I was told my an old machinist to use a lead additive if I didnt have hardened valve seats. Not needs for newer heads
with hardened seats.... I would use it, better safe than sorry.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
d500neil
Posted 2010-06-21 7:53 PM (#228960 - in reply to #228955)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Exner Expert 19,174 posts. Neil passed away 18 Sep 2015. You will be missed, Neil!

Posts: 19146
5000500050002000200010025
Location: bishop, ca
Supposedly, an old-vintage car's cylinder heads have absorbed enough tetraethyl lead into its valve
seat areas, during its working life, in order to lubricate/shield those areas adequately, now that non-leaded gas is
being used.

Unless I was racing my car or subjecting it to heavy-duty usage, I wouldn't worry about adding lead-substitutes
to the gasoline---until an O/H might become necessary, due to the age-wear of the engine.

I would be concerned about the ignition timing and the octane/quality OF the gas that I was installing, however.



Top of the page Bottom of the page
1960DesotoAdventurer
Posted 2010-06-21 8:51 PM (#228973 - in reply to #228960)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3588
20001000500252525
Location: Plymouth Spaceport
well,thanks for all the input.
That's interesting to learn the flathead six doesn't need hardened valve seats,I always assumed since it was such an old motor it probably wasn't using as modern engineering materials as the newer v8's.
I have used the cd2 "insteadalead" additive in the past,but had heard lead substitutes weren't necessary from a couple different collectors,so I figured I'd get the general consensus of my fellow forward look finatics.

I just bought a 57 belvedere with a 301 v8 that I plan to use for my daily driver.

Guess I'll use the lead substitute just to be on the safe side.

Edited by 1960DesotoAdventurer 2010-06-21 8:52 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MOPAR-TO-YA
Posted 2010-06-22 2:17 AM (#229023 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: RE: lead additives necessary or not?


Expert 5K+

Posts: 5139
500010025
Location: cornpatch county, Southwest IOA
What about the valve guides? Where do they get their lubrication? Good stem seals should not let any oil reach them.......................................MO
Top of the page Bottom of the page
60 dart
Posted 2010-06-22 11:29 AM (#229066 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert 5K+

Posts: 8947
50002000100050010010010010025
Location: WHEELING,WV.>>>HOME OF WWVA
ya don't need lead added to the engines we use and with out any hokus pokus metal suckin up lead over the past and why our engines are pretty much bullit proof is due to one fact , HIGH NICKEL casting materials . plain and simple !---------------------------------later
Top of the page Bottom of the page
dukeboy
Posted 2010-06-22 12:24 PM (#229081 - in reply to #229023)
Subject: RE: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert 5K+

Posts: 6203
50001000100100
Location: Big pimpin'
MOPAR-TO-YA - 2010-06-22 2:17 AM

What about the valve guides? Where do they get their lubrication? Good stem seals should not let any oil reach them.......................................MO



"Good" Valve seals let just enough oil get by as to where you don't see it out the pipe....Bad Valve seals let Too much oil by causing the oil smoke upon start up.....If there was no lubrication from the valve seals, the seals themselves, along with the guides, would completely wear out/and or freeze together in a VERY short time...Contrary to popular belief, Every engine on the planet burns a certain amount of oil, some just burn Excessive amount of oil....

Edited by dukeboy 2010-06-22 12:28 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BigBlockMopar
Posted 2010-06-22 12:51 PM (#229084 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3575
20001000500252525
Location: Netherlands
Everyone who's putting lead-subs in their tanks of their weekend-drivers are wasting their time and money.
Given the fact that most engines here haven't had a head-rebuild in years, by the time your exhaustvalves really start to wear and 'sink' into the seats due to the unleaded gas, the entire head needs to be rebuild aswell. During that rebuild hardened seats will (can) be installed.

Ever since lead started to disappear out of our local gas I've started to fuel up with unleaded.
The '65 Imperial 413 engine in my '62 stationwagen has never been apart sans for a new timing-set, and has been running without any problems since then. Used the wagen as a dailydriver for a number of years.
The motor is now getting a bit 'tired' these days and probably would like to be rebuilt, but I'm sure with the occasional outing it gets it will be able to drive effortly for another 10-15 years in this state.


Edited by BigBlockMopar 2010-06-22 12:53 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
60 dart
Posted 2010-06-22 3:00 PM (#229101 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert 5K+

Posts: 8947
50002000100050010010010010025
Location: WHEELING,WV.>>>HOME OF WWVA
ahhhhhhhhh ,, i believe the first unleaded gas was used in 1923 in some of the very early v8's like chevrolet----------------don't point a finger , look it up-------------------------------------------------------------------later
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mopar1
Posted 2010-06-22 4:34 PM (#229125 - in reply to #229101)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3034
2000100025
Location: N.W. Fla.
60 dart - 2010-06-22 2:00 PM

ahhhhhhhhh ,, i believe the first unleaded gas was used in 1923 in some of the very early v8's like chevrolet----------------don't point a finger , look it up-------------------------------------------------------------------later
Poor recolection of leaded gas being invented by GM in late 30s or just after the War in the compression/octane development race.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BigBlockMopar
Posted 2010-06-22 6:02 PM (#229137 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 3575
20001000500252525
Location: Netherlands
I don't point fingers, I pull them... my own usually :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
dukeboy
Posted 2010-06-22 7:06 PM (#229167 - in reply to #229137)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert 5K+

Posts: 6203
50001000100100
Location: Big pimpin'
Holy sh*t, I had no idea Chevy hadda V8 in 1923?!

And All this time, I thought the first Chevy SB came out in 1955.....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Swept57
Posted 2010-06-22 7:22 PM (#229173 - in reply to #229167)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert

Posts: 1622
1000500100
Location: Seville, OH
We haven't had an Engine Of The Day for a while, but the Chevrolet Series D V8 engine deserves some attention. 288 cubic inches, overhead valves, crossflow heads… and it was manufactured 38 years before the small-block Chevrolet engine. That's right, Chevrolet had an OHV V8, generating an excellent-for-its-time 55 horsepower, back in 1917!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
60 dart
Posted 2010-06-22 8:16 PM (#229184 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?



Expert 5K+

Posts: 8947
50002000100050010010010010025
Location: WHEELING,WV.>>>HOME OF WWVA
yes 1917-----------------------truck-----------------------------------------------------------------later
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Fintail and Son
Posted 2010-06-22 8:19 PM (#229185 - in reply to #228835)
Subject: Re: lead additives necessary or not?


Extreme Veteran

Posts: 313
100100100
Location: New Jersey
I periodically put 100 octane low lead airplane gas in my cars (3-4 gallons at a time) just to keep the 'lead memory' alive. The cars love it, especially the hemis in the '56 and '57 Dodges. If I use too much the car will have a hard time starting. ---Fred
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

* * * This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated * * *


(Delete all cookies set by this site)