Re: IML: Imperial Air Cleaner Trivia - CAP
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: Imperial Air Cleaner Trivia - CAP
- From: Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:31:04 -0800 (PST)
http://imperialclub.com/Yr/1970/Emissions/Cover.htm
This addresses the question in the first page and
thereafter.
-K
--- Chris Strohmeyer <chrisstroh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Was this to cut emissions??
>
> Chris
> 67 Imperial
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: RODGER D. REDDISH
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:58 AM
> Subject: Re: IML: Imperial Air Cleaner Trivia
>
>
> Hola Class
>
> To make it all in one statement, the 1963-1966
> Imperial Air cleaner Housing assembly is the same
> part number. This unit was made with a "clean" tube
> and one that had a fitting for the Calif Air Package
> ( CAP ). They also had a dual tube snorkel that was
> made in both manners for dual exhaust equipted cars.
>
> The later units starting in 1967 with the little
> hole at the end of the long tapered snorkel is the
> same as the industry of that era. By this time the
> CAP equipted cars was a norm. The Dual Snorkel unit
> was still with the OEM dual exhaust.
>
> Uncle Rodger & Aunt Gabby
> COS
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: john sadowski
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 1:52 AM
> Subject: Re: IML: air cleaner
>
>
> The 66 also has that style air cleaner.
> John
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Strohmeyer"
> <chrisstroh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:42 PM
> Subject: Re: IML: air cleaner
>
>
> >I hear K@N makes a filter without needing the
> metal housing! It's all air
> >filter. I can't imagine it not boosting your
> HP. I wonder if those were
> >smog only air cleaners in California? I read a
> 1967 review of the Imperial
> >that said they were surprized at the lack of HP
> compared the the previous
> >year. I wonder if this and the 5 degrees before
> TDC timing instead of
> >12-1/2 BTC is there way of cutting
> emissions...and HP.
> >
> > Chris
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ken Lang" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:12 PM
> > Subject: RE: IML: air cleaner
> >
> >
> >>
> >> My 68 New Yorker (owned many years ago) had
> the same air cleaner design.
> >> It
> >> didn't make sense to me how enough air could
> get through that small
> >> opening
> >> especially when you compare it to hugh
> opening in the top of the
> >> carburetor.
> >>
> >> So to allow more air to get in I flipped the
> entire air cleaner over and
> >> drilled a string of 1/2" diameter holes
> around the bottom just outside of
> >> the filter element. Once the air cleaner was
> back in place the holes
> >> were
> >> not visible and all air that came through the
> new holes still had to go
> >> through the filter element.
> >>
> >> To be quite honest, I don't know if I
> improved anything or not. The car
> >> still ran like a spotted ape and still got 10
> mpg.
> >>
> >> Ken
> >> 67 Crown 4 Dr Ht
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Chris
> >> Strohmeyer
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:30 PM
> >> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: IML: air cleaner
> >>
> >> I'm curious, I notice my stock air cleaner
> has the inlet "horn" that is
> >> only
> >>
> >> about 1-1/2inches! Doesn't this choke the
> engine on my 67 Imperial?
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----------------
> http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> >> This message was sent to you by the Imperial
> Mailing List. Please
> >> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and
> your response will be
> >> shared with everyone. Private messages (and
> attachments) for the
> >> Administrators should be sent to
> webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----------------
> http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> >> This message was sent to you by the Imperial
> Mailing List. Please
> >> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and
> your response will be
> >> shared with everyone. Private messages (and
> attachments) for the
> >> Administrators should be sent to
> webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
> -----------------
> > This message was sent to you by the Imperial
> Mailing List. Please reply to
> > mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your
> response will be shared with
> > everyone. Private messages (and attachments)
> for the
> > Administrators should be sent to
> webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
> -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial
> Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your
> response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and
> attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to
> webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
Kenyon Wills
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network