Re: IML: 1952 vs 1953
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: 1952 vs 1953



In 1953, Imperial seemed to start taking Cadillac
seriously.  Compared to 1952 the 53 model appears 
longer, sleeker, and more luxurious.  The interior is
vastly upgraded, too.  Additionally, in later 1953,
Powerflite automation transmission was introduced
replacing the old Klunk-O-Matic.  The industry's best
A/C system was introduced about the same time.  The
Ebay '53 has both features, making it as highly
desireable as a '53 can be. Plus, it is a pristine
car.  It definitely gets my vote.

Chris H.





--- Timothy Hulse <t.hulse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hey everyone,
>    I was on ebay and seen the 52 Imperial and the 53
> Imperial. Why is the 53 so much and the 52 with
> 10,000 original miles, original everything not
> bidding as well. There are no hits on the 52. Is it
> because everyone is bidding on the 53 and when they
> dont get it they will go to the 52?
>    
>   Thanks 
>   Tim
>   Bakersfield Ca
>   1956 2-door Southampton
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/

-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.