On Dec 11, 2007, at 7:42 PM, John L. Chesnutt wrote:
Hi Remco Van Lent.
What rear axle ratio do you intend to use? Because with the factory ratio you will not be able to make the 200 MPH mark. Run out of RPM.
John Chesnutt, Portland, Oregon
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: IML: 1964 through 1966 Disc Brake Option
Not only the brakes should be updated when going real fast.
Also the complete suspension and the rest of the drive train needs a lot of
work.
I live close to the german autobahn and will surely floor it when the new
engine is ready to go.
What's the use of building a 800 HP +++ supercharged 392 and not use the
power?
I hope to be able to hit the 200 MPH mark, not on a weekday's rush hour but
on a early sunday morning with a almost
empty autobahn for myself.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: IML: 1964 through 1966 Disc Brake Option
There was a
post about needing better brakes to get the most out of the engine,
which makes me wonder if some folks think that by converting their
brakes they can drive faster or follow more closely. Those are bad
driving habits which have nothing to do with realizing the potential of
the engine. Public roads are a community of people who have to work
together to get along. If someone wants to find out how fast their car
will go, they need to make arrangements with a race track, not
experiment with fast driving and a different braking system on a public
road. The excessive burst of power available to Imperial Owner's is
there for safe passing on two lane highways and smoothly merging with
high speed freeway traffic.
Paul W.
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
