Re: [FWDLK] Car Values Online

["s scott" <kneedrager@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

You are all good citizens, the gubment must appreciate that you pay more
taxes by claiming a higher price than you actually paid.
HA HA
Scott


>From owner-l-forwardlook@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Jan 13 14:04:26 1999
>Received: from PSUVM.PSU.EDU by LISTS.PSU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
>   with BSMTP id 7517; Wed, 13 Jan 99 16:51:43 EST
>Received: from LISTS.PSU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@PSUVM) by
PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LMail V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 4149; Wed, 13 Jan 1999
16:50:49 -0500
>Received: from LISTS.PSU.EDU by LISTS.PSU.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
1.8c)
>          with spool id 2404 for L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wed, 13
Jan 1999
>          16:50:48 -0500
>Received: from PSUVM (NJE origin SMTP@PSUVM) by PSUVM.PSU.EDU (LMail
>          V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 4139 for <L-FORWARDLOOK@PSUVM>;
Wed, 13 Jan
>          1999 16:50:47 -0500
>Received: from pgh-nt4.ketchum.com (199.181.110.4,3563) by
PSUVM.PSU.EDU (IBM
>          VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Wed, 13 Jan 99 16:50:47 EST
>Received: from ketchum.com ([199.181.111.237]) by pgh-nt4.ketchum.com
(Netscape
>          Messaging Server 3.5)  with ESMTP id 161 for
>          <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:50:24
-0500
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
>X-Accept-Language: en-US,ja
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>References: <Pine.GS4.4.02.9901131354340.3283-100000@xxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Message-ID:  <369D1528.AE49738B@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date:         Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:50:32 -0500
>Reply-To:     Dave Stragand <dave.stragand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sender:       Forward Look Mopar Discussion List
<L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>From:         Dave Stragand <dave.stragand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Organization: Ketchum
>Subject:      Re: [FWDLK] Car Values Online
>To:           L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>smike wrote:
>
>> > IMHO, the prices seemed a bit low, but it's a good start.  The 1958
>> > Plymouth values seem about right.
>>
>> I don't know where they get their facts, but take this info with one
large
>> grain of salt.  I looked up '69 Super Bees (OK, not F-L, I admit) and
it
>> said to add 15% for a 440-4bbl, which was never offered in that car.
It
>> also listed a #1 condition Six Pack at $14,800 in base form.  The
last #2
>> car I saw for sale brought $45,000.
>>
>> I'm just suggesting that auctions and actual sales provide a better
>> baseline than a magazine ever can.
>
>Also, a lot of the magazines get their information from state title
transfer
>tax forms stating the "price paid" by the purchaser.  I'm sure I'm not
alone
>when I tell y'all that my "price paid" on the tax form -may- have been
>substantially different than the "price paid" to the seller...
>
>-Dave
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com