Re: [FWDLK] Welcome Ken Fermoyle
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] Welcome Ken Fermoyle



At 02:49 PM 3/4/99 -0600, Bruce in Tulsa wrote:
>Hello List,
>
>I'm sure I speak for all Forward Looker when I say it's a pleasure to
>have Ken on the list. His direct involvement with the cars we love as an
>automotive writer is a valuable resource.

If you guys are interested, I'll be happy to share some of my experiences. Here's one I sent to Dave Zappa in response to a query from him about a custom 1955 T-Bird he owns -- which was featured in Motor Life magazine. Bear with me, because it does have a MoPar connection (the Dodge Lancer wagon test for Pop Science) and fills in a bit more of my background.

> Thinking about Ken Dunn triggered another memory. After I joined Pop
> Science (1959) we were doing 10,000-mile road tests, mostly on new
> compacts, and I usually had the chore of picking up the cars (which Pop
> Science bought outright from dealers; they weren't company-provided test
> cars) and putting on the first 2500-4000 miles. I took a Dodge Lancer
> station wagon from Detroit down to Florida (with a quick flight over to
> Nassau for part of SpeedWeeks there) and then back to NYC. (Nassau, BTW,
> had to be the swingingest place in the Western Hemisphere during
> SpeedWeeks, but that's another story!)
>
> I stopped in Daytona early one morning to take some photos at the
> almost-new Tri-Oval track, just as Bill France was arriving. He same me and
> came over grinning: "What are you doing here, Ken? There's no race today."
> I explained about the road test and he suggested we take a ride around the
> track.
>
> "Ford is doing so testing here today and Ken Dunn is the engineer in
> charge. You know him, don't you? Maybe he'll let us take a spin when they
> don't have a car on the track."
>
> I said that I did know Ken and Bill jumped into the Dodge wagon with me.
> Sure enough, we caught Ken just as there was a break in their testing. He
> wound up getting into the wagon with us, and I drove a half-dozen laps
> around the Tri-Oval with Bill & Ken for company. Only problem was, we had
> ordered the Lancer wagon with some options, including a 3.83 rear axle
> ratio, so it was completely wound out at about 89 mph -- which was hardly
> fast enough to get up on the steep banking of the Tri-Oval.

The Lancer had fine acceleration but not much on the high end, and gas mileage was not that great.

>Ken, I encourage you to share some of your experiences during this
>period. What did you and your fellow writers think of Chrysler's lineup
>in the mid-50s to early-60s? We know you certainly liked the 1955 300.
>What were some of your most memorable experiences dealing with Chrysler
>at this time? What were those Exner cars like to drive fresh out of the
>box?
>
>LOOKING FORWARD to hearing more about your career,
>
The cars were great-looking, good performers, and handled well for that era -- especially with some of the
HD suspension options available. Worst rap on them was quality control: things like leaky trunks (I had a 50-something Imperial test car once that leaked so bad it ruined a suitcase suitcase stowed in the trunk); body panels that didn't always fit well (due to "tolerance creep"), etc. But I liked 'em. I drove a '57 Plymouth Fury to Daytona Beach and hit 102 mph with it in a measured mile in the Beach Trials. Probably would have done better but the beach was in bad shape that day, deeply furrow so that the car was airborne a lot of the time. The Fury had HD suspension (& dual quad carbs, as I recall) and it saved the lives of me & my family on the way home to Detroit. I was coming up a hill on a narrow 2-lane road in Georgia when, all of a sudden, a fat guy in an Olds smoking a big cigar was coming at me head-on in my lane -- passing another car as he crested the hill. I managed to swerve to the right, on the very, very narrow road shoulder, just enough to miss him (by about the thickness of a Pop Science magazine) and get straightened out before I rolled off the hill. I couldn't have made that maneuver in most other stock cars of the day without losing it.

Is that the kind of stuff you'd like to read?

Take care, Ken


Ken Fermoyle, columnist (Ken's Korner) & publisher
Fermoyle Publications, (818) 346-9384
22250 Capulin Court, Woodland Hills, CA 91364-3005
Newsletters, Editorial Services, Graphics & Web Design
"In the beginning was the Word..." And don't you forget it!  


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.