Re: [FWDLK] taillight lens question

[Terry & Andree Hoeman <tehoema@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I had never caught that the lens with the chrome strips was listed as an
assembly.   Interesting.   always assumed the strips were just separate
item.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Watson" <wwatson@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] taillight lens question


> Dave,
>
> I have a 1955 Chrysler parts catalogue, and it does not list a different
> taillamp lens for the 1955 Chrysler.  It lists three lenses :
>
> 1622 195 : C67 (Windsor)
> 1622 195 : C68 (New Yorker - early & C300)
> 1627 022 : C68 (New Yorker - late)
>
> The later lens had chrome trim moulding on it (2 separate pieces), and was
> used from S/N 99,804,620 (Windsor) and N55-14287 (Jefferson Ave).
>
> But the lenses appear interchangeable for all models, whether sedans or
> wagons.
>
> Bill
> Vancouver, BC
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Charles Gedraitis" <dcg@xxxxxxx>
> To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 2:11 PM
> Subject: [FWDLK] taillight lens question
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've senn the taillight lens on a normal '55 chrysler (not the
imperials),
> > and they look very much like the same ones on the wagon ('55 windsor) we
> > have. Does anyone know if they are interchangeable? The gentleman who
has
> > them at his junkyard claims they won't fit, but I disagree. I'd very
much
> > like to know what will and what won't fit this car...
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > ~dave
> > '61 Newport
> > '67 Kaiser M-715
> > '91 Toyota Pickup
> >