Re: [FWDLK] The REST of the Story... DRAG WARS!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] The REST of the Story... DRAG WARS!



so.... for comparison purposes.... can we say the 58 350 commando plymouth is a good track match for the 56 dodges in question?? based on the better weight transfer, weight, and power numbers???  what was the 56 d500- 260hp?  the 350 reported 305 if i remember, and the plymouth is within the 100lb range of the dodge............i think an out-of-box 58 fury was reported at a 15.7.... i dont know- i just read articles and retain info- dont make a library of stock facts as they only apply to 2 of my 36 cars... anyway
back to the 58 commando---
i have a '68 2bbl cammed 383 in my 59 fury daily driver- swapped on an iron 66 4bbl intake and 65 413 carter... dual exh, dead stock 727, 3.23 '65 300 suregrip rear.. now i raced a friend of mine as a joke with one of my former pontiacs that i have at least 20 15sec flat timeslips on... needless to say- blows my 59 away by 80mph by a good couple car lengths, so that same 59 fury that gets torn up by a 15 sec pontiac, tears up a stock 58 commando car a friend of mine has.... off the line, and even worse on the highway from a 60-top pull.... thus placing it in the high 15's-16 flat.. which statistically doesn't make that much sense, essentially same weight, close gearing, and a claimed 305 hp against 290hp [2bbl rated/sing exh] which is more like 305 with a 4bbl/dual... just more cubes and torque at work.....
 
all that just comes down to is the 16 second time on the 56's sounds right-  and whoever is going to island, i'm there.....  i'll put a 2x4 under my pedal or shut off 2/3 track in one of my 58s and try to run in the 16sec range too!   for nostalgia purposes only that is
 
i scanned most of the posts about these cars- but lightly for quick info- my only fwdlk dodges are 2 59s, crl and rl.... and 1 desoto... all else 57-8 plyms... so based on that it didn't apply to me to do more than take it as conversation, but i did see a similarity in mph in regards to the varying e.t.'s..... which a few replied to me about....  mph denotes hp.... the times can vary by a whole second with only a 1-2mph gain, but within parameters... of the range everyone is talking about....with the d-cars
they were great back then, and obviously beat pretty much everything across the board back then... figuring only another chrysler product would hang with the dodge-  for had nothing to do the job... and i cant imaging a 265 chevy in a 56, or even the olds getting under a 17sec pass... let alone the 22 second 322 nailhead in the buick for 56
 
so all in all, maybe 1 dodge did the amazing back then... their timing equipment was close-to-par to modern towers... i just doubt it can be replicated now if we had to, even with good tires and higher octane gas that we now can throw in the cars




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.