Re: [FWDLK] Bringing a car into the United States

[Jan & Roger van Hoy <vanhilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Foolish me, I was taught that once one enters into a contract it is legally 
enforceable and that the time for negotiation is before entering into the 
contract.  Gee, I could have saved a lot of money on all that edyoukayshun. 
It just comes down to might-makes-right.  I can not doubt that some people 
can not doubt this.  It's so simple!

For those of us who were passing notes in [bullying] class, what kind of car 
are we talking about here?  I'd like to join in the buyer's joy at his or 
her new acquisition.

--Roger van Hoy, Washougal, WA, '55 DeSoto, '58 DeSoto, '56 Plymouth, '66 
Plymouth, '41 Dodge






----- Original Message ----- 
From: "eastern sierra Adj Services" <esierraadj@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] Bringing a car into the United States


> Sorry, I forget your first name,  Mr. Benson, but I hardly think that I
> am being dishonest, and I also question the harshness (altho the seller
> might argue that point!) adjective, too.
>
> I didn't read the seller's terms on that auction, but I can not doubt
> that a CAN seller (or, a US seller, advertising in CAN) would want the
> buyer to come across the border and to go thru all the hassles and
> expense of taking the car across the frontier.
>
> Everything is negotiable, and in that regard: he-who-wants-it-more:
> LOSES.
>
> If the buyer wants the car worse than the seller wants to sell it, the
> buyer takes the extra time and trouble and expense and hassles in
> getting it across the border.
>
> If the seller wants the money, more than the car-possession, he will
> agree to take the car across the border and conclude the transaction in
> the buyer's country.
>
> Simple as that.
>
> Neil Vedder 

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1