RE: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs

What was different to 62, Doug, ?? when you say definitely not correct? Length of them ? If they came off 300H, how are they not correct? Part # issue only? Did they change that with wheel base reduction? If not spoken for I’ll take them. Can you strap to skid can get Estes to pick up. Any $ you incur ,I can make you whole, OK?


Car sat low?


Sometimes same thing has different part #’s , minor upgrades, (or downgrades , like Mopar did to wreck AMC 4.0 six JEEP pistons! Managed to wreck one of best engines made)--- does not impact use of them


From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 11:53 AM
To: 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Chrysler300
Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs


My mistake - should have said 59, not 69.

Definitely not correct for 62 - part #2275869 or 32240686.

Guess could be correct for 59, 60 & 61.

Anyone need them - free to good home - just pay shipping.

Doug Warrener



From: "2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Chrysler300" <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 3:57:56 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs



Hi Group,

Need help identifying a set of rear springs #1946113.

They came off of a 300H when I installed new Eaton springs.

They were rebuilt sometime in the past, but need to be re-arcked.

Does the 19 mean 1969?


Doug Warrener



Posted by: "John Grady" <jkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

To send a message to this group, send an email to:

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to

For list server instructions, go to

For archives go to


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap