What was different to 62, Doug, ?? when you say definitely not correct? Length of them ? If they came off 300H, how are they not correct? Part # issue only? Did they change that with wheel base reduction? If not spoken for I’ll take them. Can you strap to skid can get Estes to pick up. Any $ you incur ,I can make you whole, OK?
Car sat low?
Sometimes same thing has different part #’s , minor upgrades, (or downgrades , like Mopar did to wreck AMC 4.0 six JEEP pistons! Managed to wreck one of best engines made)--- does not impact use of them
My mistake - should have said 59, not 69.
Definitely not correct for 62 - part #2275869 or 32240686.
Guess could be correct for 59, 60 & 61.
Anyone need them - free to good home - just pay shipping.
From: "2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Need help identifying a set of rear springs #1946113.
They came off of a 300H when I installed new Eaton springs.
They were rebuilt sometime in the past, but need to be re-arcked.
Does the 19 mean 1969?
Posted by: "John Grady" <jkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To send a message to this group, send an email to:
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or
go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit
For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang