Re: Max Wedge aluminum rocker arms
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Max Wedge aluminum rocker arms



i have gold cranes on my solid cam, they have been
running flawlessly for over 6 years now, this engine
sees alot of heavy abuse at the track, but also about
1000 miles a year on the street, i am paranoid enough
to check them often, but they basically don't move.
before this i had harland sharps that worked the same
way in a race/street motor with no problems.

a brother had steel mopar rockers on his street motor,
with solid cam, he was constantly adjusting his,
switched to gold cranes about 2 months ago, so far no
problems.

i run the car at between 3000/3500 rpm on the highway
and shift at 6000 at the track. 

i have heard of problems, but i also know of several
guys running them without problems, these days it
seems like it has been acceptable to have "bad
batches".
don't get me started with edelbrock!!

tom
65 satellite 440/727/4.10's 



--- Brian Schlump <jsbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 
> Is anyone else using Crane aluminum roller rocker
> arms on their 426 Max 
> Wedge or clone engine?  I'm using the gold colored
> ones part #64792-1 
> and I've had problems with 2 sets.  Exactly 1 year
> ago this weekend I 
> was coming home from a car show and one lifter
> started making noise.  I 
> tore down the engine and found that intake rocker #5
> had shifted toward 
> the exhaust rocker, and the aluminum portion was
> opening the valve 
> rather than the roller.  The valve stem wore right
> into the aluminum.  I 
> discovered that I messed up the assembly sequence,
> so I wrote it off as 
> a learning experience and ordered a new set.  I
> assembled that set 
> correctly, and figured that was the end of the
> problem.  Wrong!  Last 
> night when I left a cruise-in, the valves started
> making noise and the 
> engine was missing while driving home.  I just tore
> it down again and 
> this time both #1 and #3 intake rockers had shifted
> toward the exhaust 
> rockers.  In addition the snap ring came out of #3
> hydraulic lifter, but 
> I was able to find all 3 broken pieces.  The engine
> hasn't been raced or 
> driven over 70 mph either time, so I don't know why
> the rockers jumped 
> out of place this time.  It has less than 2,000
> miles on it since the 
> repair last year.  I took the intake rockers from
> the last assembly I 
> changed and made 1 good set from the two.  I also
> added 4 more round 
> shims to the spacer spring between all 4 cylinders
> of that head in order 
> to put more tension on the rockers.  Has anyone else
> had similar 
> problems with these rockers?
> Brian    
> 
> '64 Belvedere
> Woodstock, IL.
> 
> "The difference between ordinary and extraordinary
> is that little 
> extra."
> 
> Your free subscription is supported by today's
> sponsor:
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erase wrinkles without Botox! Nexiderm SP is
> clinically proven to 
> reduce wrinkles by 68% Click here to get your 30-day
> free supply.
>
caadHllbOgXg2f/Nexiderm
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to
> only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e.,
> send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well
> as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total
> volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to
> Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
>
> 
> 



		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.