Re: IML: Question about harmonic damper
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Question about harmonic damper



Thanks Paul,

I am still not sure what to do, both dampers on the link I provided (the
first and second damper on that page) are SFI approved so I am sure they
will be premium quality.
But for only $10 more or so, I will have me a fluid damper that softens
vibrations on a much broader rpm range.

So what should I do????

Robert



Op Di, 9 januari, 2007 6:54 pm, schreef randalpark@xxxxxxx:
> For what it's worth, I also suggest rebuilding the original or
> replacing it with the same type.
>
> Paul W.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fljoslin@xxxxxxxx
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 8:54 AM
> Subject: Re: IML: Question about harmonic damper
>
>
> Rob:
>
>
> In the theme of originality, I am pretty sure that you can get you
> original damper rebuilt to better than original specs.   For Imperial
> applications, you do not need a race damper.  
> Check these guys out:
> http://www.damperdoctor.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code
> =DD&Category_Code=CHR
>  
> I have never used them, but they may be worth contacting.  They seem to
> have many dampers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob van der Es"
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: IML: Question about harmonic damper
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:52:56 +0100 (CET)
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> In addition to my earlier message of yesterday with regard to my request
> for information I would like to add this link:
>
>
> www.440source.com/dampers.htm
>
> The first damper on this page is a stock damper (allthough it is SFI
> approved..) and the second one is a fluid damper (just like Fluidampr is
> selling for almost three times as much). So I think I will choose one of
> those two.
>
> Can anyone explain to me (Dick B. or Paul W. maybe ?) what the benefits
> are of a fluid damper. I have been told that a fluid damper is working
> better at a broader rpm range than a standard elastomer (rubber) damper.
> Is this true, and will
> it do my engine and bearings good because they suffer less from harmonics?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
>
>
> Robert van der Es
> 1960 Imperial Crown Hardtop
>
>
>
>
>
> Op Ma, 8 januari, 2007 4:47 pm, schreef Rob van der Es:
>
>> Hello gang!,
>>
>>
>>
>> First of all I would like to wish y'all a Happy New Year.
>> To start my new Imperial year the right way, I am preparing my 1960
>> Imperial for the coming riding season (that will be the end of April
>>
> then,
>> considering the climate overhere).
>>
>> One of the things I would like to replace is the harmonic damper
>> (sometimes called a balancer but that ain't the right word for it,
>>
> since
>> the cranckshaft of our 413's is internally balanced). I think the
> outer
>> ring of mine has slipped over the years, resulting in an incorrect
> timing
>> mark. I also think that since the ring was able to slip the rubber
> between
>> the inner and outer ring is malfunctioning.
>>
>>
>> So I am looking for a new one. Now my question: should I go for a
>>
> normal
>> replacement damper (with rubber elastomer inside) or should I go for a
> high tech fluid damper?? I have been told that fluid dampers are much
> better
>> for a long engine life (read crankshaft and bearing life) since they
> are able to absorp harmonics over a wider rpm range.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
>> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
>> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared
>> with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators
>
>> should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
>> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared
> with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators
> should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
>
>
> Fred Joslin
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and
> security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across
> the web, free AOL Mail and more.
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared
> with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators
> should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
>




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.