Re: [FWDLK] FW: [FWDLK] All this late model and future discussion...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] FW: [FWDLK] All this late model and future discussion...



On several new "cars" that I have purchased over the years, I was forced to pay a gas guzzler tax of a thousand dollars or more.  Who are the miscreants in our guberment that have given an exception to this tax to SUV's and pickup trucks.   This is beyond stupidity(but they are Politicos and know not what they do).  As a matter of fact the guberment would give you a tax credit and also allow you to write off in deductions the total amount of any vehicle of over 6000 pounds if used for "business purposes, yea right!".  This of course is why you see all these giant Hummers, Navigators, Excursions(used by soccer mom's and commuters) and other such riff raff vehicle on our highways spreading their death and destruction wherever they go.  Not to mention subsidizing those countries that support Islamic.terrorists in their attacks on our country and crazies such as Hugo Chavez. 
 
So the next time you are whining about the price of fuel, take a look at the SUV next to you who did not pay a dime in penalty to support their gas guzzling ways, which of course means more expensive fuel for your Ford car.  We have met the enemy and the enemy is us, said one wag(Pogo).
 
Roger Schaaf
300 B  17 MPG on a good day, but only less than 40 gallons per year.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rich Lee
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:45 AM
Subject: [FWDLK] FW: [FWDLK] All this late model and future discussion...

?and one way to accomplish this is to not only look forward but to use the side- and rear-view mirrors.  It was impressed upon me that 50 percent of the time, the driver should be looking in the rear-view mirror.

 

The whole industry is a sham.  Who lobbies Congress to fight raising CAFE standards?

 


From: Forward Look Mopar Discussion List [mailto:L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brent Burger
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:18 AM
To: L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] All this late model and future discussion...

 

    I had a similar experience.

 

    My high school driver's ed. teacher tried to impress upon the class that the best drivers were the ones who rarely had to use their brakes - explaining that this gave maximum fuel economy, was easy on the car's mechanics, the brakes lasted forever, and these driver's would be safest, because in order to minimally use the brakes, you had to be an extremely observant driver, anticipating the road situation far in advance.  These principals weren't lost on me.

 

We were told by the powers-that-be that the reason cars lost chrome bumpers and real metal and style was "safety and economy".  I'd rather take a bread truck in my DeSoto than any full size car for sale today, and if 20-25 mpg is the best anyone can offer after fifty  $#@!  years of research and development ?????  Gimme a break !  We were lied to.  The whole industry is a sham !  It is bad enough they look like bars of soap and you need $200,000 diagnostic equipment to work on them.  But don't tell me they are great cars.  I have a garage full of great cars.  I KNOW what those look like !

 

    B.

 

 

 

Hi all:

 

In December of 1964, our college SAE Club held an economy run throughout the Greater Los Angeles area.  I went to a local Rambler dealer and they gracioiusly loaned me a new plain Jane 1965 Rambler American stick shift.  This dealership had sponsored the previous year's Mobil Gas economy run winner to Yosemite.  They gave it to me a week ahead of the run for practice, retarded the timing to 5 degrees after tdc (this what they told me) and put some smaller jets in the carb.  I added a vacuum gauge. 

 

Just before the run, my navigator put 40# of air in the tires.  During the run, I drove without a shoe on my right foot.  My navigator looked ahead and advised me of the light situation.  In total, we had to stop for only 4 of the 88 lights on our run.

 

End result, we won the contest with 45 mpg!

 

Dan Reitz

Northridge, CA

 

    ******************************************

 

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1

*************************************************************

To unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.