| 
 Dave, 
  
    Yep, now you got it right. Of all the changes to make a 
Mopar run faster I have found the rear end ratio makes the biggest 
difference. The 56 Plymouth  Fury came through with a 373 rear end. 
All  the Touqueflite automatic 57 and 58 Fury's and D-500's came 
through with  336 ratios which I feel worked against the Touqueflite 3 
speed gear advantage. I feel Chryslers big mistake by not putting a 
373  or 391 rear end ratio in the 57 / 58 as the stock rear end since they 
were advertised as performance cars. 
  
General Motors sold 4:11 rear gears like they were going out of style those 
GM cars really .performed. Chrysler products eventually went to a 354 rear gears 
in the 70's as their performance rear end. 
  
The disadvantage of the higher geared rear ends is highway driving  
RPM's are higher so you tend to keep your driving speed under 65 MPH. 
To offset the higher RPM's we ran the biggest and tallest tires would could find 
for the highway to bring the RPM's down a little. 
  
     Ron 
  
PS. Did you know in 1957 the fastest car that did 0 to 60 MPH in 
7.5 seconds was the Rambler Rebel and that model only came through with a 411 
rear end STOCK. 
  
  
  
In a message dated 9/5/2015 4:09:40 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
dhomstad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: 
Ron, 
  
  Ah, now it makes sense. You left your 56 Fury in 1st gear until 50 ft 
  from the 1/4 mile finish line. The PowerFlite 1st gear ratio was 1.72, and the 
  TorqueFlite 2nd gear ratio was 1.45. When a TF shifted into second and rpm 
  dropped from 5000 to 3000, the PF has a gear ratio advantage and a higher rpm 
  resulting in more power. 
  However, the TF has a huge advantage over the 
  PF while the TF is in 1st gear! First gear in a TF is 2.45, and will last up 
  to at least 50 mph. And with a 3.91 rear ratio, a TF would have the same 
  overall gear ratio in 2nd as a PF in 1st, and even better in high. 
  In 
  theory, a TF with 3.91 would jump ahead of a PF off the line, at 50 mph go to 
  2nd, but with higher speed from the start and the same overall ratio, the rpm 
  should be slightly higher, thus making more power and making the 57 even 
  harder to catch, then just before the finish, shift into high, but at a higher 
  rpm for more power at the finish. 
  Probably the biggest disadvantage 
  for a 57 is the extra 400 lbs or so they are dragging along. 
  I'm not 
  so sure a 2 bbl has any advantage off the line. A WCFB 4 bbl operates on the 2 
  bbl primaries until engine demand opens the vacuum secondaries for more power. 
  If the engine doesn't need it, it won't take the extra fuel.  If you are 
  burning rubber up to 30 mph, there seems to be no need for more power at the 
  launch. Maybe with the lower power of a 2 bbl there will be less wheel spin 
  and greater traction for more acceleration, for 20 feet. 
  I don't have 
  any launch power problems from excess fuel with my dual quad 56. Without a 
  SureGrip, it just sits there and makes lots of tire smoke, without even power 
  braking first. 
  Average times at 15.50 is excellent for anything from 
  1956. A best at 14.58 seconds is tremendous time! Congratulations! 
  
  Dave Homstad  56 Dodge D500 
  
  
  ----------------------------------------- From: 
  Archangel1390@xxxxxxx To:  Cc:  Sent: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 01:33:06 
  -0400 Subject: Re: [FWDLK] 57 Custom Royal Lancer D500 badging
  
    
  Dave,  
  
  Perhaps I did not make it clear on my explanation, My Powerflite was 
  wound tight 5000 RPM's at 50 feet from the end of the quarter mile, the 
  shift into drive was like a kick in the ass with a big surge forward over the 
  finish line.  
  The Powerflite was always in it's power range from 30 MPH to 80 MPH with 
  a super push into drive a 5000 RPM's. Also my 56 was torque up against the 
  brake to spin the tires up to 30 MPH when the light went green  
  .  
  It is a fact that a 2 bbl carb is faster off the starting line for the 
  first 20 feet then a 4 bbl carb, and a 4 bbl carb is faster then dual carbs 
  for the first 20 feet from the starting line.  
  ( 20 feet off the line in drag racing is about one car length)  
  
  Dave, on paper what you say makes sense, but  my opinion is the 
  lower first gear ratio should be quicker but the dual carbs from a dead 
  stop should be quicker but instead they were neutralized 
  by the fact that the 2/4 bbl dumped enough gas to slow the car off the line. 
  When racing a 3 speed torqueflite  they would start closing the gap 
  on my 56 that  was ahead of them, but before they 
  could close the gap between us they would shift into second gear which 
  took them out of their power range and they would drop back when in second 
  gear while my 2 speed powerflight was still in its full power range. 
   
  
  I hung out with guys with 56,57, 58 Fury's and Golden commando. My best 
  friend Frank Lewis had a 57 Fury 318 and really want to beat my 56. One day he 
  asked me what I would do if I had a 57 Fury to make it faster? I told him one 
  four barrow carburetor  and a 391-1 rear end gears.  Well later I 
  was sorry that I gave him that advise-------he went to one 4 bbl and 391-1 
  gears and I had a hell of a time beating him. He would cross the 1/4 
  mile finish line right ahead of my rear bumper. If I was slow 
  on the starting line he could jump me and beat me.  
  My average time in the quarter mile was 15.50 seconds, later I went with 
  the factory optional package of dual four carbs, factory hotter cam, 391-1 
  rear gears, wider tires and traction bars and turned in my best time of 14.58 
  seconds.------( and still stock and Powerflite)  
  
        Ron  
  
   
  
  In a message dated 9/4/2015 3:21:19 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
  dhomstad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:  
  Ron, 
    
  The 56 Mopars had 15 inch wheels and the 57s had 14 inch wheels. 
    With the rear ratios you mentioned, the engine rpm in high gear should be 
    close enough as to make no difference. 
  With these gears, these 
    Mopars would need to be moving at nearly 120 mph at the end of a 1/4 mile to 
    be near the engine rpm red line of about 5000 rpm and wound tight. This mph 
    needs a car capable of 12 second 1/4s. Ain't no way a stock 56/57 Mopar is 
    going to get there that fast.  
  The advantage 57s had was a much 
    lower first gear in a TorqueFlite.  The advantage 56s had was 400 lbs 
    less weight. 
  I'd place my money on a 56 D500 with a TorqueFlite. 
    
  Dave Homstad  56 Dodge D500/ TorqueFlite  
  
    
    ----------------------------------------- From: "Ron Swartley" 
    <0000109753cb24f9-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To:  Cc: 
     Sent: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:25:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [FWDLK] 57 Custom 
    Royal Lancer D500 badging
  
    Dan,  
     
         The powerflite 2 speed automatic 
    D 500 in 56 has 354-1 or 373-1 rear end gears stock and the 
    57 D 500 with Toqureflite 3 speed came with a 331- 1 rear end 
    gears. In a quarter mile that makes a big difference. I raced both for more 
    than 20 years.. Powerflite 2 speeds were wound tight at the end of the 
    quarter mile and Toqureflites are not peaked out with stock rears. 
     
     
        Ron Allyn Swartley  
    
    
    
      Hi Daniel:  
      
      I'll have to agree with Gary.  Back in June 1956, I purchased a 
      new D-500 with the Coronet 2-door body.  Had the 315 Hemi and a 
      single carb.  Weight with a full tank of gas was 3685 lbs.  When 
      the '57 D-500's came out, one of the dealer's salesmen challenged me to a 
      race.  From a dead start, we were even for about 5 feet and from then 
      on it was my race!  He also had a 2-door model with the 325 hemi and 
      a sinlge carb.  I went into the Air Force in May of 1957 and the only 
      car that ever beat me until then was a tri-power Pontiac and that was by 
      only a length or two in 0.6 miles.  
      
      Dan Reitz  
      Bell Canyon, CA  
      
      
      
      In a message dated 9/3/2015 2:31:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
      glpavlovich@xxxxxxx writes:  
      Daniel,
  I 
        place my "bet" on the lighter chassis; '57 Firesweep, if it is indeed 
         lighter. Gary Pavlovich 56 Plymouth w/Poly 318 
        Stroker
  -----Original Message-----  From: Daniel 
        Davids Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:22 PM To: 
        L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [FWDLK] 57 Custom Royal Lancer 
        D500 badging
  Fellow Forward Lookers,
  I’m currently doing a 
        bit of overdue tuning and sprucing up the engine  compartment of my 
        1957 CRL. My example is two-tone green with the D500 engine option 
        (325 hemi, block  stamped KD500).
  I have a question about the 
        badge on the trunk lid of this year, model, and  engine 
        option. Should it not have a red and black “500” emblem in place of 
        the helmeted  lancer with spear?
  The brochures for this year 
        Dodge are pretty short on explanation of option 
         packages.
  Cheers from wet and soggy Seattle — a nice change 
        from 10 weeks of straight  sunshine (not normal),
  Dan 
        Davids
  P.S. Once we get her running again, we plan to do a runoff 
        of sorts with my  57 Firesweep, which as the 325 poly. The numbers 
        for horsepower and torque would say the CRL is quicker, but my  son 
        thinks the lighter weight (lower trim) Firesweep will prevail. 
        Bets?
  *************************************************************
  To 
        unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go 
        to http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
  Help 
        the Forward Look with every eBay purchase by starting your search 
        here: http://www.ForwardLook.net/eBay
  Help the Forward Look 
        with every Amazon purchase by clicking 
        here: http://www.ForwardLook.net/Amazon 
        
  *************************************************************
  To 
        unsubscribe or set your subscription options, please go 
        to http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
  Help 
        the Forward Look with every eBay purchase by starting your search 
        here: http://www.ForwardLook.net/eBay
  Help the Forward Look 
        with every Amazon purchase by clicking 
        here: http://www.ForwardLook.net/Amazon 
        
       
      ************************************************************* 
      To unsubscribe or 
      set your subscription options, please go to  http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1 
       
      Help The Forward Look with every Amazon purchase by clicking 
      here! Help the Forward Look 
      with every eBay purchase by starting your search 
    here!   
     
    ************************************************************* 
    To unsubscribe or set 
    your subscription options, please go to  http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1 
     
    Help The Forward Look with every Amazon purchase by clicking 
    here! Help the Forward Look 
    with every eBay purchase by starting your search 
  here!     
************************************************************* 
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to  
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1  
Help The Forward Look with every Amazon purchase by clicking here! 
Help the Forward Look with every eBay purchase by starting your search here!  |