|
Jimmy Peavy <peaver63@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 29 08:44PM -0600
There is an exception. A 1960-1961 383 cu. in raised block. Jimmy ...more |
|
Gary Wilson <gwwilson70@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 29 06:45PM -0800
That is correct. -- Gwwilson ...more |
|
Stan Kafouse <skafouse@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 03:01PM
There is no way a 454 piston will work that is a joke.. show me how it works. A 415 crank new rod and a 427 piston come close...close. You don't need to sonic test a block pre 65 let alone 70 over ...more |
|
Gary Wilson <gwwilson70@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 08:24AM -0800
No one said anything about 454 that I saw/ 440 pistons will work if the block is thick enough. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:01 AM, 'Stan Kafouse' via The 1962 to 1965 Mopar -- Gwwilson ...more |
|
Christopher Glick <mrchristopher1@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 04:42PM
Or .60 on a 413 ----- Original Message ----- From: "'Stan Kafouse' via The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ...more |
|
Gary Wilson <gwwilson70@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 08:50AM -0800
Just remember to have the block checked for thickness. Not all 413 s can be bored to 7o over. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Christopher Glick < -- Gwwilson ...more |
|
dongallimore <dongallimore@xxxxxxx>: Nov 30 12:22PM -0500
What is it in your experiences with a 413 block that leads you to the conclusion you can bore it 70 over and not be concerned enough to sonic test? Just curious. I do have a 70 over 413. ...more |
|
Butch <waedison@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 11:02AM -0800
As I've continued to research this, I found this on this site http://www.moparts.com/ "426W pistons haven't been in stock for over 20 years. Just get 383 pistons with the pin height changed. ...more |
|
B M <polara1964@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 07:23PM
doesn't Hughes Engines no pistons and other 413/ 426 stuff?? good luck ________________________________ Van: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> namens Gary ...more |
|
Richard Snow <onemortimeracing@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 12:59PM -0700
Don't know about 454 pistons,But back in the 80's before all the kits became the norm I had VENOLIA make some 4.250 stroker pistons for a 440 block with 6.760 Chrysler Rods These were made using ...more |
|
Scott Preston <penstarperformance@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 05:52PM -0500
Look dude,we have done this many times,if you wish to dicuss this on the phone not a problem,we talk about,if you do not,that,s not a problem either ,but don,t start with name calling as it just ...more |
|
Stan Kafouse <skafouse@xxxxxxxxx>: Dec 01 12:23AM
He has a stock crank not 4.25 crank so therefore your 454 piston wont work Dude. On Monday, November 30, 2015 5:53 PM, Scott Preston <penstarperformance@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...more |
|
63max426@xxxxxxxxx: Nov 30 07:51PM -0500
Hi Butch, I had a set made from CP “Custom Pistons”, http://www.cp-carrillo.com/Company/History/tabid/56/Default.aspx <http://www.cp-carrillo.com/Company/History/tabid/56/Default.aspx> ...more |
|
"Roland Osborne" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 06:59PM -0600
Sounding a lot like moparts here sports fans… and aren’t you an RFC chaplain Stan? From: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, ...more |
|
MO <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 29 06:29PM -0800
Ever see this ? ...............................MO.. ...more |
|
<62-65-mail-list-club@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 29 08:50PM -0600
Do you mean the valve cover decals? No, I assume they are custom homemade. http://www.hemmings.com/mus/stories/2006/01/01/hmn_feature4.html talks about a 413 police pursuit 1964 Dodge. ...more |
|
Jimmie <jimmieam@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 29 07:02PM -0800
Had a '63 ex-CHP one of these in '67-69. Jimmie Sent from my iPad ...more |
|
Richard Kinsley <leroar.kinsley058@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 29 09:51PM -0600
That hood scoop is Thunderbolt style. But I still like it. ...more |
|
george smith <bt6t4@xxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 08:22PM
Looks like a 64 Ford Thunderbolt scoop to me. I favor the MW or Hemi scoops designed for our cars. IMO George -------------------------------------------- On Sun, 11/29/15, MO ...more |
|
MO <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 01:27PM -0800
Yes George, and 95% of all the other Mid 60's Mopar owners.! 8-) .. there is a method behind the madness. Somebody here ought to know what this is about. More pics and explanation ...more |
|
"Gary H." <62to65mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 09:00PM
Hi all, Several people have joined the 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse discussion since a club hat availability announcement was made. For new members -- or any member -- who is interested ...more |
|
"Gary H." <62to65mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 08:55PM
Hello all, As a heads up, this email is to let the members of this mail list know that there will again be a 1962-1965 calendar for 2016. :) I expect the calendar to be ready sometime in December. ...more |
|
Nico Over <nover2@xxxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 09:22AM -0600
While at the Turkey Run in Daytona this past weekend, had a good discussion with the folks at Hydro-Electric about fixing/overhauling power window motors for our cars. Mr Ryan Smith is the POC at ...more |
|
"Hall, Ricky L" <ricky.l.hall@xxxxxxxxxx>: Nov 30 02:10PM
2” stand-off to raise the stock throttle return spring bracket works out well. Lokar working fine but had to do over again, would go Bouchillon hardware and the longer slant 6 / max wedge ...more |
|
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. |
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network