Re: [FWDLK] Additives
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] Additives



See how many of the additives tested in the article are also running an ad in that
issue.....and see if the additives that get the better ratings also happen to have
the biggest ads.  I'm just curious Hmmmmm!

Brian
D500s in MI

"john g. photakis" wrote:

> I think either Hot Rod Magazine or Popular Hot Rodding this month has an
> article on octane and additives. They did find some difference. Check it
> out.
>
> paulholm wrote:
> >
> > David Charles Gedraitis wrote:
> > >
> > > To my understanding-they are almost all junk. Most of the additives that
> > > one might need, such as dry gas, are already in the gasoline you buy. I
> > > say junk as the ones that offer to "increase horsepower" etc, don't have
> > > any proff of what they actually do-and the people who say they see
> > > results, are also looking for them, and want to see them, which is
> > > inherently biased. The only product I know of which has been tested by the
> > > SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) is Slick 50, which apparently has
> > > some merit as an engine protectant. I have yet to find the article
> > > published by the SAE, but I'm sure one of us will soon enough. Good luck,
> > >
> > > ~dave
> >
> > I've never had any complaints with Marvel Mystry Oil. Seems to be nice
> > stuff, been around a LONG time.
> >
> > --
> > Paul Holmgren
> > Hoosier Corps #33, L-6
> > 2 57 300-C's in Indy



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.